5 pm to 7 pm
Natalia Cecire, Yale University
Can U.S. experimental writing meaningfully be periodized–or even defined? This book chapter examines the tension between experimentalism’s association with the historical avant-garde, on one hand, and the concept’s resistance to periodization, on the other. I propose a historical approach that learns from the inherent tensions in discourses around the “experimental,” arguing that the history of science at the turn of the twentieth century, and the historical exceptionalism attributed to experimental science in particular, helps to account for them.
Scholl Center Seminar papers are pre-circulated electronically. For a copy of the paper, email the Scholl Center at email@example.com. Please do not request a paper unless you plan to attend.